You think you want realism in games, but you don’t really want

Realism is something I have often seen. They not only want games that seem realistic, but they want them to act in realistic ways. However, is this? truly Something makes the game better? For the largest part, I don’t think so.

What you really ask is originality

What I think is asking about it when they say “realism” is in fact “originality.” What is the difference? Well, see a game like Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and battlefield. These games are not realistic in any way. Lead physics and how weapons work are completely wrong, and of course, you cannot heal the wounds by linking behind a low wall for a few seconds.

However, they are striving to be authentic, and look like the way you expect it. This does not mean that photography seems to be the real thing, but it seems the way you expect. The way the weapons sound, the characters, the environment, as well as, and other details at the surface level of the game create a impression of realism, but interest in originality is the one who makes the deception.

Realistic is rarely enjoyable

Video games are supposed to be fun and entertaining. Now, I am not so tight that I do not understand that people can find anything fun. Heck, I have heard that some people go and walk outside for fun. I think it is called “long -distance walking” or something like that.

So, yes, there are games that have a strong focus on realism, and there are people who really enjoy them, but these games tend to be specialized. Let’s take Eagle A series of games as an example.

This is a game concession that focuses on final realism. Get bullet once, and end. The bullet physics is close to the real world, and tactics are a matter. You may have a complete task without pulling the trigger once, then it ends in a second from the shooter you never seen. Why? Because this is life, and life is not fair. For me, this is not necessarily fun, but there are people who love it.

Realism only in playing service

For more prevailing games aimed at more attractive, realism is definitely in its place, but its use should be cautious. In a game like Kingdom comes: salvation 2 You need to manage the hunger and bleeding of your personality, which looks realistic, but of course, in real life, it would take weeks or months to recover from his wounds, not some bandages and some doses.

Realistic touches like this should serve the game good, and make the game better. If you do this for wrong reasons, you will eventually give the players the busy work. So before you complain that something in your game is not realistic, think if it made it realistic might make the game better.

Unless you want to simulate, it is something of its own

If what you want is a suitable simulation and not an actual game, then there is nothing wrong with it. Simulation devices contain many militant fans, and I am my soul in the race of simulation and flight simulation devices.

If you want a kind of games that balance between simulations with the fun gameplay in the most elegant way, what you are looking for Sim is overwhelming games. Which, in my opinion, are some of the best video games.